Combination Therapy with UV-4B and Molnupiravir Enhances SARS-CoV-2 Suppression.

The host targeting antiviral, UV-4B, and the RNA polymerase inhibitor, molnupiravir, are two orally available, broad-spectrum antivirals that have demonstrated potent activity against SARS-CoV-2 as monotherapy. In this work, we evaluated the effectiveness of UV-4B and EIDD-1931 (molnupiravir's main circulating metabolite) combination regimens against the SARS-CoV-2 beta, delta, and omicron BA.2 variants in a human lung cell line. Infected ACE2 transfected A549 (ACE2-A549) cells were treated with UV-4B and EIDD-1931 both as monotherapy and in combination. Viral supernatant was sampled on day three when viral titers peaked in the no-treatment control arm, and levels of infectious virus were measured by plaque assay. The drug-drug effect interaction between UV-4B and EIDD-1931 was also defined using the Greco Universal Response Surface Approach (URSA) model. Antiviral evaluations demonstrated that treatment with UV-4B plus EIDD-1931 enhanced antiviral activity against all three variants relative to monotherapy. These results were in accordance with those obtained from the Greco model, as these identified the interaction between UV-4B and EIDD-1931 as additive against the beta and omicron variants and synergistic against the delta variant. Our findings highlight the anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential of UV-4B and EIDD-1931 combination regimens, and present combination therapy as a promising therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2.

Why Molnupiravir Fails in Hospitalized Patients.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has radically altered daily life. Effective antiviral therapies to combat COVID-19, especially severe disease, remain scarce. Molnupiravir is an antiviral that has shown clinical efficacy against mild-to-moderate COVID-19 but failed to provide benefit to hospitalized patients with severe disease. Here, we explained the mechanism behind the failure of molnupiravir in hospitalized patients and identified alternative dosing strategies that would improve therapeutic outcomes in all patients with COVID-19. We showed that delaying therapy initiation markedly decreased the antiviral effect of molnupiravir, and these results were directly related to intracellular drug triphosphate pools and intracellular viral burden at the start of therapy. The adverse influence of therapeutic delay could be overcome by increasing drug exposure, which increased intracellular molnupiravir triphosphate concentrations that inhibited viral replication. These findings illustrated that molnupiravir must be administered as early as possible following COVID-19 symptom onset to maximize therapeutic efficacy. Higher doses may be effective in patients hospitalized with severe disease, but the safety of high-dose molnupiravir regimens is unknown. Our findings could be extended to design effective regimens with nucleoside analogs for other RNA viruses, especially those with pandemic potential. IMPORTANCE In this study, we showed that early intervention with molnupiravir resulted in a greater antiviral effect, and we explained the mechanism behind this phenomenon. Our results predicted and explained the failure of molnupiravir in hospitalized patients and highlighted the utility of preclinical pharmacodynamic studies to design optimal antiviral regimens for the treatment of viral diseases. This contrasts with the procedure that was implemented early in the pandemic in which clinical studies were conducted in the absence of preclinical experimentation. These findings are significant and demonstrated the importance of experimental approaches in antiviral development for treatments against COVID-19 as well as other viral diseases.